"Practice" VS "Frame": Alternative Projects of Everyday World Research

  • Виктор Вахштайн Centre for Fundamental Sociology
Keywords: Harold Garfinkel, metaphor, Goffman, sociology of everydaylife, frame-analysis, theoretical logics and codification, theory of practices, transcendent and immanent, context of everyday action, figure and background

Abstract

The main purpose of the article is to codify the theoretical resources of the sociology of everyday life. The author focuses on the two research programmes of the contemporary sociology of everyday world: the frame theory and the practice theory. The author reveals basic conceptualizations of practice-orientated sociology and frame-analysis, their constructive features; analyses their inherent axiomatics and logics, trying to find their theoretical implications for the sociology of everyday life in particular and the sociological theory in the whole. The method of codification used by the author - description, distinguishing constitutive features of the basic conceptualizations, reconstructing the logic and pointing to the theoretical implications – is also the object of critical reflection in this article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2011-03-30
How to Cite
ВахштайнВ. (2011). "Practice" VS "Frame": Alternative Projects of Everyday World Research. Russian Sociological Review, 7(1), 65-95. Retrieved from https://ihe.hse.ru/index.php/sociologica/article/view/483
Section
Papers and essays